What do the words dictator, authoritarian, totalitarian, tyrant, oppressor, despot, autocrat, and even oligarch have in common? They all describe an individual who holds a severe belief in a universe of lack, consistently attempting to place themselves into a position of a god—gluttonously overindulgent disease.
They all describe an individual who grasps onto the weakest of foundational principles—the rule of lack—clearly no act of one who holds true almighty power. For to truly be of almighty power, one would have to believe in a universe of infinite abundance—a universe where lack can only exist in the minds of the ultimate weak. As a result all—absolutely all—governments encompassing such descriptions as the preliminary list of words are doomed to fail, and assuredly will. In fact it is the safest of all bets.
In consideration of the power inherent with the common faith in money, top money players have historically acted to influence government as if it were a subservient portion of a gluttonously bloated corporation in the surest direction of doom. The power hungry, suffering under their mentality of lack, continually tighten their blinders so they are less likely to witness their own destructive repercussions, actively refusing to see the big multidimensional enriching environment.
The health of a national economy only does well when the beating heart of wealth is pulsing a highly nutriated flow throughout the reaches of its existence, which always brings benefits back to the heart. Therefore money must flow through all hands in relative abundance. Otherwise the stagnation of wealth constipated in the bowels of dirty hands can only result in a cancerous tumor, that if allowed to siphon life unchecked will certainly kill any country.
An alternate bet that has many variables, including the determination and quality of what is a win or loss, is the sustainability of a government built upon the foundations of democracy. In truth the only system of rule that can successfully survive something close to eternity is a republic. But as Benjamin Franklin so concisely indicated, “a republic, if you can keep it”…
For it is up to the- and every- individual and the enduring singular plural of we the people through the ages to ensure the encompassing malleability of an ever changing populous can incorporate the balancing of powers in such a manner that will persistently ensure the lifting of an entire country.
Such is a purpose of the truly almighty.